I have been in the business for quite some time and I can assure you that an extremely choppy/uneven intake and exhaust port and no work in the transfer runners is not the way to make "Big" power.
I have been in the business for quite some time and I can assure you that an extremely choppy/uneven intake and exhaust port and no work in the transfer runners is not the way to make "Big" power. A good port job should look as well as it functions even if nobody can see inside of your engine. It should be smooth and consistent, as in free of ripples, dips, nicks or sudden changes in surface texture. The porting should be symetrical from side to side as if a mirror image from left to right, which is esspecially critical in the transfer ports to promote propper cylinder scavenging. All of the true builders that I know put a level of quality that can be easily seen in their work.
Did you all stop to think that MrBorroco hasn't posted in here again because it has become the Kennedy chearleader thread. He got beat up for asking if it looked right and what people thought. Of course Kennedy is going to tell him that it is perfect, so I'm sure he didn't feel the need to ask him about it. Furthermore, the biggest issue he had with it from my reading is that the spark plug threads were stripped when he got it back, which IMO is no way to conduct business.
I can post all of the dyno charts in the world, and I can also make them read whatever I want them to and tell you that they are whatever I want you to think. I will admit, that it has been a very clever sales tactic for Mr. Kennedy to post them up. But, the fact of the matter is that they are merely a tool to be used to guage improvement on a particular setup. You can take the same setup/tune and run it on two different dyno's and get two different results. Nothing can replace a real world load, period! And hours upon hours on the dyno doesn't mean you can port a set of cylinders. It is more of an art, something you either have the hands for or don't. All of the knowledge in the world will get you nowhere if you can't put it to use. Furthermore, you can not convince me that the Vito's or Shearer pipes are the best pipes for every single application and suited for everyone's riding style. There are many pipes on the market that will beat either of these on the bottom end hands down.
Something for thought: Why are the intakes cut on his port jobs? Seems funny to me that he cuts them at all if there is "no gain" in cutting the intakes. Hmm??
Well said Wildcard2. I still think Mr Kennedy knows his stuff, even though that port job is a little sloppy.
So, your saying that dyno's are only good for tuning and that they can be manipulated to show what ever you want? I do agree with you about real world performance. That is what counts. I just put a Kennedy ported top end on my son's bike. A ported 240 kit set up for a +3 stroker for under 500.00 is a great deal. I hope your wrong about the performance. Do you have any examples of what a good port job looks like on a blaster cylinder
I could have sand blasted the intake and then cut the intake; would you have gained power; no. It would have looked better; do you want a intake that looks nice or a engine that makes twice the OEM power. That set up with a Shearer pipe and 35mm carb, and timing set at +4 is good for 33hp
]
I have been in the business for quite some time and I can assure you that an extremely choppy/uneven intake and exhaust port and no work in the transfer runners is not the way to make "Big" power. A good port job should look as well as it functions even if nobody can see inside of your engine. It should be smooth and consistent, as in free of ripples, dips, nicks or sudden changes in surface texture. The porting should be symetrical from side to side as if a mirror image from left to right, which is esspecially critical in the transfer ports to promote propper cylinder scavenging. All of the true builders that I know put a level of quality that can be easily seen in their work.
Did you all stop to think that MrBorroco hasn't posted in here again because it has become the Kennedy chearleader thread. He got beat up for asking if it looked right and what people thought. Of course Kennedy is going to tell him that it is perfect, so I'm sure he didn't feel the need to ask him about it. Furthermore, the biggest issue he had with it from my reading is that the spark plug threads were stripped when he got it back, which IMO is no way to conduct business.
I can post all of the dyno charts in the world, and I can also make them read whatever I want them to and tell you that they are whatever I want you to think. I will admit, that it has been a very clever sales tactic for Mr. Kennedy to post them up. But, the fact of the matter is that they are merely a tool to be used to guage improvement on a particular setup. You can take the same setup/tune and run it on two different dyno's and get two different results. Nothing can replace a real world load, period! And hours upon hours on the dyno doesn't mean you can port a set of cylinders. It is more of an art, something you either have the hands for or don't. All of the knowledge in the world will get you nowhere if you can't put it to use. Furthermore, you can not convince me that the Vito's or Shearer pipes are the best pipes for every single application and suited for everyone's riding style. There are many pipes on the market that will beat either of these on the bottom end hands down.
Something for thought: Why are the intakes cut on his port jobs? Seems funny to me that he cuts them at all if there is "no gain" in cutting the intakes. Hmm??
Thanks Wildcard for saying exactly what I've been thinking for a long time.
As for the guy that said that he paid $500 for a port job and 240 set up, I think you could have done better on the performance end. Yes not a bad price though.
And for specialized7, I do know the whole story, do you?
I myself have a question for THE BUILDER?
I see that mrbrocco is running the vito's pipe.
When he sent his cylinder to you to have work done did you discuss what pipe he was going to run, or did you just port it to what you thought he should run?