centrifical clutch
- Thread starter 2003blast
- Start date
probally burn out not 100 percent sure, but im sure there are ways around it. Why would you want to change?
Cant imaging it being cheap either
Cant imaging it being cheap either
You would be better off buying a new quad. Those centrifical clutches dont hold up to well unless you spend big money and get an expensive comet clutch used in high performance applications. Anything is possible to do but in this case its not practical in a money sence for sure.
Well, that would only work right if he wanted to dispatch of the gearbox as well as the hoffco clutch is for the CVT transmission.
I'm assuming by centrifugal clutch you want to make a semi-auto quad so they still have to shift, just not learn how to take off with a hand clutch.
The semi-auto gear boxes actually use two clutches... one is similar to the one under the side cover of the blaster only it's exclusively actuated by the shift lever (instead of the left handle bar). The other is a true centrifugal clutch call the "primary". The "primary's" center hub turns all the time and outer bell is only turned when the engine is turning fast enough.
The outer bell of the "primary" is geared to the outer hub of the "secondary". The "secondary" is engaged all of the time except when you are shifting the bike. When you are shifting, it breaks the torque to the transmission input shaft (inner clutch hub) to allow the transmission to shift under no load.
There is no room to put the primary clutch under the side cover as it sits. I'm not saying that it's impossible to put a centrifugal clutch on a blaster. With a milling machine, a lathe, a bunch of billet aluminum, a donor clutch and an engineering degree anything's possible!
You best bet, if you'd like to retain the shifting a general "sporty" feel of the blaster (with a huge sacrifice in actual sportiness) is look for a honda 250ex. They're "sport" 4 wheelers with semi-auto transmissions.
If sporty isn't such a requirement, you could look for a beartracker, recon, or quadrunner. They are all 250cc with semi-auto transmissions.
I'm assuming by centrifugal clutch you want to make a semi-auto quad so they still have to shift, just not learn how to take off with a hand clutch.
The semi-auto gear boxes actually use two clutches... one is similar to the one under the side cover of the blaster only it's exclusively actuated by the shift lever (instead of the left handle bar). The other is a true centrifugal clutch call the "primary". The "primary's" center hub turns all the time and outer bell is only turned when the engine is turning fast enough.
The outer bell of the "primary" is geared to the outer hub of the "secondary". The "secondary" is engaged all of the time except when you are shifting the bike. When you are shifting, it breaks the torque to the transmission input shaft (inner clutch hub) to allow the transmission to shift under no load.
There is no room to put the primary clutch under the side cover as it sits. I'm not saying that it's impossible to put a centrifugal clutch on a blaster. With a milling machine, a lathe, a bunch of billet aluminum, a donor clutch and an engineering degree anything's possible!
You best bet, if you'd like to retain the shifting a general "sporty" feel of the blaster (with a huge sacrifice in actual sportiness) is look for a honda 250ex. They're "sport" 4 wheelers with semi-auto transmissions.
If sporty isn't such a requirement, you could look for a beartracker, recon, or quadrunner. They are all 250cc with semi-auto transmissions.
i hav not found a rekluse clutch for the blaster yet, i was actually lookin into it a while ago
I don't see one but then again, I've never seen such a thing before either... I bet with a little time they cold whip one up...
Now a polaris is going to be fully automatic. Is that what you want? It's not really training anyone for getting used to a blaster like that.
