Don't be so sure to blame the chain. Even the slightest off center sprocket alignment will cause this.
This bein a new build I would take another look at them.
I hear you!
Definitely something to check out, and I did, but the alignment looks good.
The chain did not, and I should have known better on the install. It had stiff spots even after soaking for a week. Probably water damage.
It was bad when I installed it. Probably seized and twisted a pin and dropped a sideplate.
Did you ever put something on that wasn't quite right and tell yourself: "It'll be OK, it'll wear in..." It often doesn't...
On a better side, that fixed up pretty easy. Had to pull the swingarm bolt to clear the chain. Bought a new chain and up and running.
Have been riding it on short jaunts, no more than an hour before checking it over. Took it on a 4 hour run yesterday.
Woods, mud, sandpit, rocks. Went with my son and his stock Blaster.
Meant to catch lots of video, but only got a few brief snippets that don't really show or prove anything but I will post them below.
Riding impression, especially compared to the stock Blaster, is pretty good.
The longer tuned pipe (Gnarly lengthened and inch or so) really changed the nature of this engine
from a screamer to a torquer. It lowered top RPM as well. It does suit the nature of the quad and works well.
Even with tall 14/40 sprockets and a tall 1st gear it idles through the rough stuff with little need to slip the clutch.
That is surprising for a motocross engine with little flywheel weight.
Top speed at about 105kph (65mph) is about 10mph or so faster than a stock blaster. Acceleration is much quicker,
but my son, the better rider, has no problem keeping up to or getting ahead of me on most trails. It's 90% rider, baby!
65 mph is plenty fast on a short quad like this. Handling was a bit odd if you let off the gas in a corner.
My 660 Raptor would do about 75mph but it too felt plenty dangerous at those speeds.
I don't think I am going to look for any more speed out of this quad. This is plenty.
Weight and balance is pretty much the same as the stock Blaster. The rad doesn't seem to raise the center of gravity.
No problems with overheating, even with slow woods trails and rocks. Damn I like the light weight better than the Raptor I had.
It doesn't wheelie like the 660 Raptor however. Tons of power and better acceleration, but not the
"anywhere in the revs" torque of the 660. This motor is more likely to spin than wheelie.
Center of gravity is lower than on the 660 Raptor too. Much easier quad to ride and get unstuck. LOVE IT!
I have a better shock on back, and it was worth the work, you can feel it. Now I need something better on the front.
The Raptor had better brakes and suspension for sure. The Blaster really hammers my arms on rough going.
Got more involved with riding than video, so this is all I have at the moment folks.
It doesn't show or prove much. You might note the low tone of the engine, indicative of the improved torque.
Not quite sure how to do videos yet but here is my try:
Video link to Steve's KTM Blaster
Video link to Neil's stock Blaster